Monday, March 30, 2009
Blog Assignment 8
When choosing my topic for my final research project, I wanted to pick something that I have an interest in. An issue in today's society is the threat of vehicle emissions projecting poisonous fumes that connect to global warming. Many people hear of global warming but are not sure the total meaning and effects it has on our Earth. The topic came across to me after watching CNN one night and I heard analysts debating whether new technologies need to be marketed to save the environment. In my eyes, I see the world as our only chance of living and if we destroy it, we destroy ourselves. By driving vehicles that emit fumes that destroy the ozone, we may be increasing the chance of having environmental issues like global warming and ozone deplation. In this topic I would put my perspective under the general public that drives one or more gasoline powered vehicles. The main source of transportation for the typical American is a vehicle and we choose to drive cars, trucks, and SUV's is because it suits us the best for the distances we must drive for everyday life.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Blog Assignment 7
For Assignment 5, I found finding the best way to accomplish my goals to writing this paper was to find the key thoughts of the stakeholder and tie it to Nye as best I can. In the two books I checked out, the similarity I found was the process in steps taken to accomplish a certain goal with technology. The example brought up was about how our technology of transportation must be changed in order to keep the environment clean. In order to try and find the right views to write my paper, I had to understand what each writer was trying to get across with their understanding of technology. I had to understand Frederick Winslow Taylor's views technology when finding and using full potential in every job.
Peer editing worked well again for me. I sat down and read almost all of the papers and found all the other opinions the class has with Nye. When I read the comments from my classmates, they found the same in my paper. Reading through classmates papers helped me see other views towards Nye that could potentially help me in my final paper. The possibility of connecting different stakeholders within my classmate's papers could help bring a new perspective to my own topic.
I've come to understand that in some cases Nye explained in detail his views, but when presented with a view he may not have interest in, he left out some critical information. Nye left out important information from one of my sources. Nye failed to mention from The Age of Asphalt the advantages from the government making the decisions in the freeway. Nye only explained the downfalls the people felt from the governments actions. We know today the advantages of the freeways, and Nye could have explained them. In order for my readers to get the most out of my paper, they should know both advantages and disadvantages, in order to compose their own opinion.
Peer editing worked well again for me. I sat down and read almost all of the papers and found all the other opinions the class has with Nye. When I read the comments from my classmates, they found the same in my paper. Reading through classmates papers helped me see other views towards Nye that could potentially help me in my final paper. The possibility of connecting different stakeholders within my classmate's papers could help bring a new perspective to my own topic.
I've come to understand that in some cases Nye explained in detail his views, but when presented with a view he may not have interest in, he left out some critical information. Nye left out important information from one of my sources. Nye failed to mention from The Age of Asphalt the advantages from the government making the decisions in the freeway. Nye only explained the downfalls the people felt from the governments actions. We know today the advantages of the freeways, and Nye could have explained them. In order for my readers to get the most out of my paper, they should know both advantages and disadvantages, in order to compose their own opinion.
Friday, March 13, 2009
A Common Relation With the Future
David Nye, writer of Technology Matters, presents his readers with a series of information about technology that is intended to stimulate his reader’s opinions. Throughout his book, Nye uses several different types of strategies to accomplish his goal of challenging his readers to think critically about technology. One of these strategies is to use several different stakeholders to show the perspectives he wants clear about technology. Two examples of stakeholders Nye uses in his book were Frederick Winslow Taylor, writer of The Principles of Scientific Management, and Richard O. Davies, writer of The Age of Asphalt: The Automobile, the Freeway, and the Condition of Metropolitan America. Taylor and Davies both discuss ways of alternative thinking towards technology.
Taylor uses The Principles of Scientific Management to educate to public about the use of science to create a more efficient society with technology. Taylor believed that for maximum success, everything must work in unison. Taylor explained this meaning when he wrote “…for each employee mans not only higher wages…development of each man to his state of maximum efficiency and the highest grade of work for which his natural abilities fit him” (9). He explained how every job had “one best way” and when done correctly, success will come about. To accomplish the task and finding the “one best way” to get done, Taylor found that scientific management would be the best decision. “It is the combination of the initiative of the workmen, coupled with the new types of work done by the management that makes scientific management so much more efficient than the old plan” (37). When combining my opinion’s of technology and Taylor’s opinions on the scientific management, I see how the two, when working at a even rate, can help progress society. Having proper management and correct technological training, the chance of failure seems to become reduced.
When observing Richard O. Davies The Age of Asphalt: The Automobile, the Freeway, and the Condition of Metropolitan America, technology in the form of transportation is looked at a closer view. Davies produced his book to explain the steps taken to construct and more efficient transportation system. Although we take such things as freeways for granted, the creation of the United States highway systems was very complicated. Technology fifty years ago was not even close to what it is today, and for that reason the education that people had about technology was not detailed. Davies staged his argument in this preface about the lack of knowledge people had about technology in the past. “When the nation opted for the freeway system as the means for transportation needs during the mid-fifties, few Americans thought in terms of possible exhaustion of energy sources, or even about environmental impact” (xi). Knowledge of technology is essential towards making the right choices for ourselves. I believe Davies, who wrote his book in the mid-seventies, was ahead of the game for which we know today. Davies knew the possibilities that could happen to the automobile if our energy sources were worn out and how our planet could be destroyed be the toxins.
I believe Nye used these two sources to escalate the importance of finding the best way and most efficient way to use technology. Having technology isn’t good enough, knowing the knowledge to use technology correctly, in my opinion, is the most important thing. Technology, when knowing the correct uses, can make life far easier and organized. In Nye’s Technology Matters, the sentence that best described using technology correctly was about Taylor’s scientific management. “He organized individual tasks into a rational sequence, so that work flowed evenly. Those who cooperated produced more” (115). Nye and Taylor’s agreement of technology shows how Nye uses his stakeholders to the fullest. I believe Nye used these two stakeholders very well in giving the reader the most information needed to understand his views on technology. Nye saw these two stakeholders as giving light to the “one best way” and understanding why technology must be used appropriately. Stakeholders that Nye left out were the people who want technology to substitute for human labor in factories and other work places. These types of stakeholders are looking for pure mechanical work, without the chance of human error. Although stakeholders who hold this view may be different from Nye’s and Taylor’s views on technology, both have positives and negatives.
When selecting a topic for my research paper, I decided writing on the progress being made in alternative technologies for transportation. Taylor and Davies opened up doors for possible further explanation, for example taking Taylor’s idea of scientific management and then plugging that into what Davies’ idea of working with changing forms of transportation to help Americans of the future. Stakeholders that will assist in my research are exploring the many experiments being done in finding new forms of technology in transportation. Examples of stakeholders that could assist me are the EPA, U.S. Department of Energy, and possibly finding those who oppose alternative technologies to view all sides of the topic.
David Nye, writer of Technology Matters, presents his readers with a series of information about technology that is intended to stimulate his reader’s opinions. Throughout his book, Nye uses several different types of strategies to accomplish his goal of challenging his readers to think critically about technology. One of these strategies is to use several different stakeholders to show the perspectives he wants clear about technology. Two examples of stakeholders Nye uses in his book were Frederick Winslow Taylor, writer of The Principles of Scientific Management, and Richard O. Davies, writer of The Age of Asphalt: The Automobile, the Freeway, and the Condition of Metropolitan America. Taylor and Davies both discuss ways of alternative thinking towards technology.
Taylor uses The Principles of Scientific Management to educate to public about the use of science to create a more efficient society with technology. Taylor believed that for maximum success, everything must work in unison. Taylor explained this meaning when he wrote “…for each employee mans not only higher wages…development of each man to his state of maximum efficiency and the highest grade of work for which his natural abilities fit him” (9). He explained how every job had “one best way” and when done correctly, success will come about. To accomplish the task and finding the “one best way” to get done, Taylor found that scientific management would be the best decision. “It is the combination of the initiative of the workmen, coupled with the new types of work done by the management that makes scientific management so much more efficient than the old plan” (37). When combining my opinion’s of technology and Taylor’s opinions on the scientific management, I see how the two, when working at a even rate, can help progress society. Having proper management and correct technological training, the chance of failure seems to become reduced.
When observing Richard O. Davies The Age of Asphalt: The Automobile, the Freeway, and the Condition of Metropolitan America, technology in the form of transportation is looked at a closer view. Davies produced his book to explain the steps taken to construct and more efficient transportation system. Although we take such things as freeways for granted, the creation of the United States highway systems was very complicated. Technology fifty years ago was not even close to what it is today, and for that reason the education that people had about technology was not detailed. Davies staged his argument in this preface about the lack of knowledge people had about technology in the past. “When the nation opted for the freeway system as the means for transportation needs during the mid-fifties, few Americans thought in terms of possible exhaustion of energy sources, or even about environmental impact” (xi). Knowledge of technology is essential towards making the right choices for ourselves. I believe Davies, who wrote his book in the mid-seventies, was ahead of the game for which we know today. Davies knew the possibilities that could happen to the automobile if our energy sources were worn out and how our planet could be destroyed be the toxins.
I believe Nye used these two sources to escalate the importance of finding the best way and most efficient way to use technology. Having technology isn’t good enough, knowing the knowledge to use technology correctly, in my opinion, is the most important thing. Technology, when knowing the correct uses, can make life far easier and organized. In Nye’s Technology Matters, the sentence that best described using technology correctly was about Taylor’s scientific management. “He organized individual tasks into a rational sequence, so that work flowed evenly. Those who cooperated produced more” (115). Nye and Taylor’s agreement of technology shows how Nye uses his stakeholders to the fullest. I believe Nye used these two stakeholders very well in giving the reader the most information needed to understand his views on technology. Nye saw these two stakeholders as giving light to the “one best way” and understanding why technology must be used appropriately. Stakeholders that Nye left out were the people who want technology to substitute for human labor in factories and other work places. These types of stakeholders are looking for pure mechanical work, without the chance of human error. Although stakeholders who hold this view may be different from Nye’s and Taylor’s views on technology, both have positives and negatives.
When selecting a topic for my research paper, I decided writing on the progress being made in alternative technologies for transportation. Taylor and Davies opened up doors for possible further explanation, for example taking Taylor’s idea of scientific management and then plugging that into what Davies’ idea of working with changing forms of transportation to help Americans of the future. Stakeholders that will assist in my research are exploring the many experiments being done in finding new forms of technology in transportation. Examples of stakeholders that could assist me are the EPA, U.S. Department of Energy, and possibly finding those who oppose alternative technologies to view all sides of the topic.
Monday, March 9, 2009
My first source was from Frederick Taylor's The Principals of Scientific Management. In his book Taylor focuses on explaining how the scientific management influences everyday events. He began his book by explaining the three main points that would be focused upon in his book. The first step informs "to point out the great loss which the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost all of our daily acts." Taylor wants to show the reader that Americans are continually being hurt because of the lack of knowledge we have.
The second point Taylor focuses on is letting the reader know that the problem of our daily lives lies in systematic management. Having uniformed management and rules being assigned to us is the major problem that needs to be solved, instead of having an above-normal man.
Lastly, Taylors final point is proving the best management is true science. He goes on to explain how this true science comes from set rules and laws to maintain society. Taylor has his three points to focus on how scientific management must be fused into how things are produced. Involving science towards rules and laws allows for a more and progressive society.
Nye uses Taylor's book to describe how every job has "one best way." Nye also describes Taylor's theory of how tasks can be broken down into sequences to become completed correctly. One thing Nye could have added how the steps done incorrectly can result in failure. Failure is an important thing to come across, and having the proper scientific management towards completing your task will help decrease these chances.
The second point Taylor focuses on is letting the reader know that the problem of our daily lives lies in systematic management. Having uniformed management and rules being assigned to us is the major problem that needs to be solved, instead of having an above-normal man.
Lastly, Taylors final point is proving the best management is true science. He goes on to explain how this true science comes from set rules and laws to maintain society. Taylor has his three points to focus on how scientific management must be fused into how things are produced. Involving science towards rules and laws allows for a more and progressive society.
Nye uses Taylor's book to describe how every job has "one best way." Nye also describes Taylor's theory of how tasks can be broken down into sequences to become completed correctly. One thing Nye could have added how the steps done incorrectly can result in failure. Failure is an important thing to come across, and having the proper scientific management towards completing your task will help decrease these chances.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)